Recall that in addition to learning goals, this course also has the goal of enabling publishable student-led research. Making your final project submission public This is what happens in peer review (at least in the ideal case in practice, unfortunately, often authors don’t make code available and reviewers are overburdened and don’t have time to look at it). Other than that, you won’t be graded based on your code, but we’ll consult it if we can’t understand something in your paper or if we want to get a deeper understanding of how your system works. Learning to carry out reproducible research is an important learning goal of the class. You should submit reproducible code along with your paper we need to be able to run your code and verify your results. See “Grading Rubric” below for more details. It’s basically like a research paper, except that you’re probably tackling a more modest problem, and we won’t penalize you if you accidentally missed prior work. We’ll evaluate your project based on the creativity of your ideas, the thoroughness of your investigation, the quality of your writing, as well as connecting your project to related work. Final project due: Decem5pm ET (Dean’s Date).Instructor feedback on proposal: Tuesday, October 27, 2020, 11am ET.If your project involves human subjects research, you may need approval from the IRB. Groups are encouraged but not required to involve students from different departments. You will work on your project in groups of 2 or 3. The above copy is just one example phrase with four different qualifiers, but several sentences may be required to demonstrate different aspects of communication skills and how well they are performed in various situations.A key element of this course is the final project. Level 4: Frequently shares ideas or exhibits teamwork in meetings or group projects.Level 3: Often shares ideas or exhibits teamwork during meetings or group projects.Level 2: Occasionally shares ideas or exhibits teamwork during meetings.Level 1: Rarely shares ideas or exhibits teamwork during meetings or group projects.For example, if you were to evaluate an employee, and one of the criteria is communication skills, you would elaborate on each potential level of performance, such as in the following sample phrases: For example, level one may be worth one point and could be described as “beginner,” “low quality,” or “needs improvement ” level two could be worth two points and described as “fair” or “satisfactory.” The scale would continue up from there, ending with the highest level of exemplary performance.Įach of the criteria can be expanded upon with descriptive phrases to illustrate performance expectations. Using descriptive language allows for a thorough understanding of different elements of a task or performance, while a numeric scale allows you to quantitatively define an overall score. The rating scale on a rubric is often a combination of numbers and words (language often ranging from low to high, or poor to excellent quality). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |